Author Archives: bookfinch

Lists are here!

Open Library is happy to report that the Lists feature is here, for your collection-building enjoyment! You can create and share lists that include authors, works (all editions of a specific title), specific editions, and subjects.

Add to List icon

While browsing around, you can see when an item has been added to somebody’s list – just look underneath the Add to List button.  Here are some items that have been listed so far:

Continue reading

Lists are coming

This is a guest post from friend-of-Open-Library, Megan Amaral. She’s currently hurtling towards the end of a Master’s Degree in Library and Information Science at San Jose State University and has a self-proclaimed penchant for metadata systems. She’s joined the Open Library team as an intern for a month or two to observe and comment on what we’re up to. Welcome, Megan! She also tweets as @bookfinch.

The upcoming Lists feature will present a really exciting opportunity for Open Library users to create and share their handmade collections of Open Library records.  Lists will be flexible enough to include pretty much everything: works, editions, authors, subjects, other lists, and potentially even specific pages of works held in the Internet Archive’s collection of scanned books.

I’m sure you already know that the Open Library catalog compiles data from different sources for its records, which can then be updated by users.  This results in a truly a dynamic collection of information.  With Lists, there will be another way for users to organize and interact with these records.  To provide an overview, here are some of my thoughts on what Lists are in the context of the Open Library catalog.

  • Lists are basic, unrestricted categorizations of things.  The sky’s the limit.
  • You don’t have to be an expert to create or understand them.
  • They are tools for sharing and re-locating records.
  • They are meaningful.  If someone goes to the trouble to create a list, then there is at least one person that the list is important to.

I’m a personal supporter of user-created lists because they provide all of us with a new way of browsing and locating resources.  As list creators, people can gather records that represent a personal idea in a sharable and retrievable format.  As information seekers, lists allow people to benefit from the opinions of experts, fanatics, and your Aunt Lulu because when anyone can make a list, anyone can become the curator of collections of their choosing.

Once released, the Lists feature will allow people to assign tags to their lists.  The lists that a book (or author) appears in will also be displayed directly on that book’s own page, which means that Open Library records and lists will intersect.  For example, an initial search for Hemingway’s book The Sun Also Rises could take you to someone’s list of “Books by American Authors who Lived in Paris”…or a list of those actual authors…or a hybrid of both.  You are bound to find something new and interesting!

Last week, I had the opportunity to participate in an early brainstorm for the Lists feature.  During the brainstorm, George identified two activities that should definitely be included in the initial release of this feature.  First, people should be notified in some way when the record of an item in their list is edited.  Secondly, lists must be able to be exported.  This second requirement launched a flurry of ideas of what, exactly, should be exported.  The exciting photo below illustrates some of our thoughts.

Lists!]

The thinking is that in addition to the immediate items on the list, perhaps the export should go a little deeper into the catalog records.  For example, if an author were included in a list (let’s call the list “Authors of Books About X-Rays”), would it be useful if the export of that list included the books that the author wrote?  Or if a Work was listed, perhaps the different Editions of that work would be useful in the list export.

The discussion also included some thinking about how the Lists feature will actually fit into the Open Library website.  What will the main Lists page have on it?  Should it display lists that contain the most actively edited records here?  Or the newest lists?  And what will be on the pages of each individual list?  (So far, these pages will include a history of edits made to the list, the Subjects of the items in the list, and an option to view changes made to the records of items in the list.)

I think that Lists will be an engaging feature for sharing and discovery.  I’ll keep you updated about this feature as the Open Library team moves closer to its release!